@zrpan   给一部分人的特权不应该建立在对其他人自由剥夺的基础上。这样才是真正的不平等。

你来说说，平等如何影响了自由?

总体而言，平等，自由是民主社会的基石。是相扶相成的。我提出这个东西是发现我们有的群友，在这方面不是很重视。太强调自己的自由权力，而缺乏在理念上对两者的坚持。

基本同意，问题是现在难道不是左派在坚持不平等吗？口口声声平等，这就是虚伪啊！

你又在贴标签了。具体一下吧！不过不说平权了，好吗？我在那方面已经讲的不想重复了

@zrpan   不是标签是事实，说BLM代表平等诉求，说All life matter就是troubling, 你解释一下，平等在哪里?

我从没这么说。但是，我理解他们的说法。我的理解是，all life matter是基础，是共识。blm的说法是alm的衍生。blm的说法更直接地提到需要改善的地方。

@zrpan  

"Imagine that you're sitting down to dinner with your family, and while everyone else gets a serving of the meal, you don't get any. So you say 'I should get my fair share.' And as a direct response to this, your dad corrects you, saying, 'everyone should get their fair share.' Now, that's a wonderful sentiment -- indeed, everyone should, and that was kinda your point in the first place: that you should be a part of everyone, and you should get your fair share also. However, dad's smart-ass comment just dismissed you and didn't solve the problem that you still haven't gotten any!

The problem is that the statement 'I should get my fair share' had an implicit 'too' at the end: 'I should get my fair share, too, just like everyone else.' But your dad's response treated your statement as though you meant 'only I should get my fair share', which clearly was not your intention. As a result, his statement that 'everyone should get their fair share,' while true, only served to ignore the problem you were trying to point out.

@古庭燕